Online news channel!

Tag: practitioners

Are Indian cities ready for the coming migration wave?

According to the World Urbanization Prospects of the UN Population Division, the percentage of people residing in urban areas is slated to rise to 60 percent by 2030 and to 66.4 percent by 2050, up from 54 percent in 2015. In 1950 the corresponding figure was just under 30 percent. This shows the magnitude of change happening across the world with an ever-increasing percentage of people residing in urban areas.

India, as a country, has been slow to urbanise. At present, according to census 2011, roughly 31 percent of Indians reside in urban areas. Over the next few years, India is expected to urbanise rapidly — and this percentage is slated to rise sharply.

A pertinent question that arises is: Do Indian cities have the wherewithal to be resilient in the face of such unprecedented migration?

At the core of finding an answer is a multi-stakeholder group comprising citizens, governments and businesses that can solve many of the urban issues that are being faced.

In the case of India, governments before the present dispensation and the present dispensation have been trying to find solutions to these questions. The earlier JNNURM and the Smart Cities Mission now are both part of the resolve to improve India’s urban ecosystem.

Representational image. ReutersRepresentational image. Reuters

Representational image. Reuters

It is in this context that a recent book by the World Bank becomes pertinent — Regenerating Urban Land – A Practitioners Guide to Leveraging Private Investment has laid focus on a hitherto less-focussed area in urban affairs that can be leveraged for better livability and competitiveness, namely, regenerating urban land. The book details a conceptual framework for understanding the urban regeneration process as well as mentions eight case studies of such projects from across the world.

According to this important work, urban regeneration is done in areas where there are pockets of under-used and under-utilized land or distressed and decaying areas.

A successful urban renewal process has four phases. These include an initial ‘scoping phase’, which primarily provides decision makers with analytical tools to confront issues facing the city. It is both forward looking and backward looking. It looks backwards for the city’s history and DNA and looks ahead to what is required.

The book goes on to cite Ahmedabad’s Sabarmati Riverfront Development project (SRDP), one of the eight case studies, as an example of a scoping exercise that took a long time for completion.

The second step is the ‘planning phase’. This involves ‘designing a web of actions and institutions’. The book explicitly mentions that a successful planning framework brings together an inspiring vision with a clear regulatory process. A planning process with the help of scoping process must detail all the vital assets and elements including land, community and environmental issues.

In the case of SRDP, the planning phase was initiated once the special purpose vehicle (SPV) for riverfront development was established.

Post this, the third stage is financing. Here, there are generally two types of tools available. Financial tools involve direct financial assistance such as value capture methods (impact fees, special assessments, extractions). Regulatory tools utilize regulatory powers of a city to incentivise private sector participation in the form of tax-based/non-tax based incentives, zoning, land use planning and the like.

In the case of Ahmedabad, an innovative financial scheme was utilised for financing. Fourteen percent of the reclaimed land was used to finance complete regeneration of the riverfront. The city used its serviced public land to raise a loan from the Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO), a central government public sector undertaking.

The final step is the implementation stage that translates the vision for sustainable change into financial, contractual and institutional relationships between the public and private sectors. This involves creating an organisational structure, which is sustainable and can exist through multiple political administrations.

In the case of SRDP, post the establishment of SPV, a diverse board was enabled with members from the private sector, the bureaucracy and the political parties (both ruling and opposition) which enabled the project to be viewed as a civic work rather than one aligned with any party’s agenda.

The other case studies in the book are equally insightful. The book is a welcome addition to the body of work for policymakers and development practitioners in India and elsewhere. It will aid development professionals and policymakers understand how urban regeneration projects can be conceived and can contribute to revitalising the economy and build its competitiveness and resilience for the future.

Over the next few years, more such thinking is required for countries like India to face some of the challenges that may arise due to their massive and haphazard urbanisation that is underway.

Government likely to enact law on passive euthanasia, invites suggestions from citizens

India will soon decide whether or not to pass a law to legalise passive euthanasia as the Union Health Ministry has prepared a draft bill and invited public suggestions before the formation of the law. The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has posted a draft Bill – Terminally Ill Patients (Protection of Patients and Medical Practitioners) on its website and opened up the issue for public debate. In a circular, the Ministry has asked citizens to submit their views by mail to [email protected] by 19 June, 2016.<!– /11440465/Dna_Article_Middle_300x250_BTF –>”Government of India has decided to solicit public opinion/comments before formulation of Law on Passive Euthanasia.The draft bill as given by Law Commission in its 241st Report is being uploaded for soliciting public opinion/comments on the same.” the circular said.
ALSO READ Tamil Nadu: Transgenders plead for mercy killing upset over their plightEarlier in 2006, the Health Ministry had examined the matter of formulating regulatory provisions for euthanasia based on the 196th Report of the Law Commission of India on ‘The Medical Treatment of Terminally-ill Patients (Protection of Patients and Medical Practitioners) Bill 2006’ in consultation with a committee of experts. However, the Ministry had opted not to make any law on euthanasia at that time. Subsequently, the Supreme Court in its judgment on March 7, 2011 in the Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug vs UoI and Others, laid down comprehensive guidelines to process ‘passive euthanasia’ in the case of incompetent patients and stated that the said procedure should be followed all over India until the Parliament makes a legislation on the subject.
ALSO READ Why did Supreme Court refuse the mercy killing of Aruna Shanbaug in 2011?What is Passive EuthanasiaPassive euthanasia, or ‘negative euthanasia’, involves withholding of medical treatment or withholding life support system for continuance of life e.g., withholding of antibiotic where without doing it, the patient is likely to die or removing the heart—lung machine from a patient in coma. Passive euthanasia is legal even without legislation, provided certain conditions and safeguards are maintained.
ALSO READ A year on, KEM hospital nurses remember Aruna ShanbaugRead the Draft Bill hereThe Ministry said that active euthanasia (which involves taking specific steps such as injecting a terminally-ill patient with a lethal substance to end suffering) is not being considered “as it is likely to be used by unscrupulous individuals to attain their ulterior motives.